Industry News

Editorials > Today's Filmwad Rant: Stop Fronting on "Death Proof"

As the buzz for "300" cooled off earlier this year, the internet publicity machine began bubbling up about "Grindhouse," the double feature film featuring Robert Rodriguez' "Planet Terror" and Quentin Tarantino's "Death Proof." Everyone you talked to seemed to have an opinion of the film before it was released and most everyone you talked to seemed psyched to see it.

Then the film came out. And no one saw it. It "tanked" on its opening weekend. Why? Maybe its offline marketing was completely lacking. Maybe mainstream audiences just didn't get it. Or, maybe, just maybe, everyone just forgot to see it. That's because despite the fact that the two films in "Grindhouse" seemed pretty badass, seeing a bloody double feature that ran over three hours was, well, pretty daunting. "I'll check it out Sunday, maybe," a friend of mine told me when I texted him, telling him I was already in line to see the film two hours before the screening. "That looks good! I'll check it out soon!" my sister IM'd me after I got home from the movie. "I love Tarantino!" my Dad told me in an email. "I'll see that this weekend!"

Surprisingly, or maybe not surprisingly, none of those people mentioned above saw "Grindhouse" in theaters. "It seems so long!" my friend told me. "No one wants to see it on Sunday!" my sister responded. I'm still waiting to hear my dad's excuse.

Whatever the reason, it seems all of the people who "kinda, sorta" wanted to see "Grindhouse" slept in.

Zoom ahead to one week ago. "Death Proof" is released on DVD. I snatch it up immediately and have since watched it several times, replaying my favorite scenes over and over, devouring all the special features in one sitting and just basking in the brilliance of the film.

Truth be told, it's one of Tarantino's best–certainly up there with the "Kill Bill" flicks and, in my book, better than "Jackie Brown." The story, the pacing and the dialogue are all incredible…and that's not even the main attraction. The chase sequences and the crashes are just phenomenal…obviously.

All this being said, I check in with my sister, my friends, anyone whom I knew just couldn't make it out to the theater for a 3 hour movie, anyone whom I know had good reasons for not seeing "Grindhouse" in theaters but who has every reason to at least download or rent "Death Proof" straight away, if not buy it (or attempt to win it on DoubleViking.com).

And guess what? No one's seen frickin "Death Proof." STILL! People…what is making you front on this? Take two hours of your life, $20 out of your budget and just see this fucking amazing movie already. Then, just maybe, I'll shut up.

Comments

Silverglade on 09/25/2007 2:06pm
I love Tarantino. I saw the full double feature in the theater. However, the one problem I have with Death Proof which I cannot seem to shake is why didn't the girls simply stop the damn car? Especially since they were quite capable of kicking ass. The villain shows up, Zoe is out there about to die and slide off the hood, I was like "um, pull over? slow down? wtf?" But I still love Tarantino and look forward to his next project.
DraytonSawyer on 09/25/2007 3:05pm
I saw Grindhouse many times in the theater and each time i was shocked at how many people didn't get what was going on. They were fuckin' lost. Goddamn. Bad marketing at work.
Elchupanegro on 09/25/2007 3:09pm
Am i the only one who actually thinks Death Proof is by-the-end-of-the-day an unsatisfying ride?
I love QT flick as the next guy, which my favorite still goes to Jackie Brown, but this "uncut" 100 something minute grind, feels like it could be slashed and mashed into something shorter, the dialogues were ranty and really seems to be QT's own morning mirror jeers rambling, anyway yeah, after you get pass the grindhouse damaged n scratched film effect (absent for 2nd half of the film) you might be finding yourself using the fast forward button alot.

sorry mate, tis' just my honest opinion,thankfully Kurt 'stuntman Mike' Russell delivers his character with 1000% chutzpah
lukaskaiser on 09/25/2007 3:38pm
I think people who like Jackie Brown and/or Reservoir Dogs most out of his stuff aren't really Tarantino fans...the guy is good enough that he's done two great straight crime thrillers...but neither of those truly capture the pop art collage aspect of his filmmaking like Pulp Fiction, the Kill Bills and Death Proof. That's just my opinion, though. Death Proof, to me, is amazing, in both forms. What it does is get you to truly truly care for the characters, and then it kills them.
DraytonSawyer on 09/26/2007 01:11am
Elchupanegro, you're right, Death Proof IS ranty and self-indulgent fare...but wasn't that the point of grindhouse style film making? Methinks so. I mean, all these old exploitation movies go on forever and have a few moments of drawn out violence. Look at, for example, Ilsa, She-Wolf of the SS. Lots of talk and setups with occasional nudity and gore. All those exploitation movies did was fluff up explicit gore/action/sex with some dialogue. Same deal with Death Proof. The winning strike in all this is that Tarantino did what he did best with Death Proof. He took a thing he liked and made it better. Unlike the exploitation of long past his dialogue isn't useless and boring, it is engaging. Some people bitch that's it's kinda corny and unrealistic. Well, yeah, it's supposed to be homaging an exploitation flick. What'd you expect?! I must agree with most, Death Proof is among Tarantino's best.
King Kracka on 09/26/2007 1:06pm
I don't understand why people bitch about the dialogue in the Death Proof. It's just great, Tarantino dialogue!

Drayton, nicely put.

And to all the jackoffs who didnt see Grindhouse in the theatre because it was 'too long', fuck you. Fuck you for saying that, and not seeing this movie even though you sit through fucking three hour movies every other weekend. People act like this is the longest movie ever made, yet they have no problem seeing any other movie that's three hours long. I'm sure if they made a three hour movie starring Dane Cook in a romantic comedy they'd see it. Assholes.
lukaskaiser on 09/27/2007 09:53am
Wellll, maybe not one w/ Dane Cook (his shit has bombed three times in a row). BUT! I will say this, Peter Jackson's King Kong was over three hours long...that's ONE mediocre movie, versus two awesome ones. Hmmmm.
You must be logged in to post a comment. Click here to login or create a user account now